Evaluation

The greatest difficulty we had while making the shot list, storyboard and script is that there wasn't much correspondence in the middle of us and this made it hard to make a shot list without comprehending what was in the storyboard. By the by, the storyboard, script and shot list turned out alright and appeared to function admirably when taping yet for next time we'll need to convey more when making the thing we requirement for after generation. Additionally, the preproduction ought to be finished and transferred to the majority of our sites within the near future just to keep away from the bother of doing it after.

WWW: Good editing in terms of utilising the recording format.
EBI: Improve on the lighting in order to build a better relationship with the audience.

For the mise-en-scene we could be changes on the grounds that we have to take lighting into more thought when taping. The props that were employed functioned admirably particularly with the effectively broke telephone and the (not really) genuine cross examination instrument. The setting was likewise great as we could utilise the false reflect looking onto a dull room. Sound was additionally utilised well as it was obviously listened. In any case, the scrupulousness could have been exceptional as the CCTV layout was photograph shopped as opposed to moving with time. The cinematography was additionally great in light of the fact that we had an extensive variety of shoots with the security camera shot functioning admirably with the traditions of a cross examination.

Everybody had a role to play in the making of the clip; actor or director and it was helpful having four people in the group because this made the whole process a lot quicker and a more efficient use of our time. Also, the plot to the film was good and along I believe with were within the conventions of an interrogation clip but also had an element of comedy and kept it within the 21st century and people laughed so we hope that’s a good sign.